Gallup survey: Iraq matters most (if you don't include Israel)

Posted By Marc Lynch Share

I wanted to call attention to the Gallup Organization's latest report on findings of its ongoing surveys of Arab public opinion.  There's a lot of questionable survey research done in the Middle East, but Gallup (along with Pew) is generally considered the gold standard for such survey research.  I've talked a number of times with the direct of research at Gallup and have been impressed by the professionalism and non-ideological nature of its work. Gallup's findings therefore deserve attention. 

There's one important caveat, though. The interviews were carried out between May and August 2008, so they shouldn't be used as evidence about any alleged Obama Effect. At best, the survey offers a snapshot of where Obama would have begun had Israel not attacked Gaza. The terrain is markedly different now, the well poisoned, and the uphill climb steeper. 

Not that it wasn't steep before. It's no surprise to anyone that the Bush administration has left a tattered American image in the broader Middle East.  Approval ratings for U.S. leadership range from 4% in Syria, to 6% in Egypt, 12% in Saudi Arabia, 13% of Palestinians, 16% of Iranians, and 25% of Lebanese (down from 40% three years ago). Those dismal figures are in line with past surveys, and seem a bit down compared to some other surveys conducted earlier last year.  The Bush administration's last Under-Secretary of State for Public Diplomacy, Jim Glassman, used to say that Global Strategic Engagement should focus on delegitimating the enemy (al-Qaeda) rather than improving America's favorable ratings in these surveys.  I guess that worked out as planned, then. (For the record, I actually agree that it's perfectly possible to hurt al-Qaeda's image without improving America's image -- there's little relationship between the two --  but that doesn't mean that the level of approval of the U.S. doesn't matter for other reasons.) 

Gallup also asked which of series of actions by the U.S. would improve views of American leadership. The main finding was that "residents in eight of the countries surveyed are most likely to say the United States' withdrawal from Iraq would improve their opinion very significantly."  Closing Guantanamo was also frequently cited, while a variety of economic and political reform suggestions received a degree of support varying by country.

There's one enormous problem with this part of the reporting of the survey, though: no results are presented about the impact of changing U.S. policy towards the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.  Since virtually every survey has found this to be among the most -- and usually the single most -- important issue shaping Arab perceptions of American foreign policy, that's a pretty major omission.  Gallup provides this note: "Gallup did ask respondents to rate an action concerning Israel, but those data are unavailable at this time."   So while I do think that Iraq is an important issue shaping Arab perceptions of the U.S. take that headline finding with a major league portion of salt.

 
Facebook|Twitter|Digg

SHAWN POWERS

8:49 PM ET

January 28, 2009

Removing military bases from Saudi Arabia?

Did Gallop field a trick question, or is it just me? They asked participants from the Middle East if removing military bases from KSA would improve their views of the United States. According to the State Department, we already have pulled our troops from Saudi Arabia: "In August 2003, following the U.S.-led war in Iraq in March and April 2003, the United States withdrew its troops stationed in Saudi Arabia." I think we still have around 400 troops there to assist with training, but I'm guessing that the the 52% of Saudis, 40% of Syrians, 60% of Egyptians, 39% of Jordanians, 40% of Palestinians and 55% of Tunisians who said that "removing US military bases from Saudi Arabia would improve their view of the US" aren't basing their opinions on the presence or absence of 400 US troops.

Note to State Department: please add this to the list of "things we really need to get cleared up with the Arab public." For all of the yammering we do about the need for a revamped and reinvigorated public diplomacy effort, I think that this may be a humble reminder of the need to simply clear up misconceptions about what is and is not US policy and presence in the region.

 

BRETT

10:28 PM ET

January 28, 2009

So the Iranians actually have

So the Iranians actually have a more positive view of the US than the Saudis? Interesting.

Note to State Department: please add this to the list of "things we really need to get cleared up with the Arab public." For all of the yammering we do about the need for a revamped and reinvigorated public diplomacy effort, I think that this may be a humble reminder of the need to simply clear up misconceptions about what is and is not US policy and presence in the region.

This is hugely important. I think people forget that the flow of information and news is by no means guaranteed, and there are a lot of misconceptions floating around in the Middle East (I remember being shocked when Robert Baer, in his first book, mentioned some common beliefs he ran into in the Middle East about the capabilities of the CIA).

 

NUR AL-CUBICLE

1:04 AM ET

January 30, 2009

Gallup did ask respondents to

Gallup did ask respondents to rate an action concerning Israel, but those data are unavailable at this time

Oh? And who ordered that the data not be disclosed?

 

Marc Lynch is associate professor of political science and international affairs at George Washington University.

Read More

January/February 2010