Monday, March 30, 2009 - 1:54 PM
The opening of the Doha Arab summit was initially overshadowed by the presence of Omar Bashir and the absence of Hosni Mubarak. But then eternal prankster Moammar Qaddafi stole the opening of the show. None of this actually leads anywhere productive, but hey -- at least it's good theater.

Qaddafi at the Doha Summit (Image source: al-Jazeera)
First, Qaddafi. The summit began with a classic bit of political theater from the Libyan despot (wait, I mean "democrat" since he cashed in his alleged nuclear program for the Bush administration's support, right? It's hard to keep up...). Qaddafi interrupted the opening statement by the Emir of Qatar to address Saudi Arabia's King Abdullah, demanding that he end the six-year long feud between the two countries. After his microphone was cut, he dramatically left the room (and, rumor has it, then took a leisurely tour of Doha's Museum of Islamic Art). The two have a history -- they got in a public spat back in the 2003 Arab summit, and the Saudis accused Qaddafi of supporting a plot to assassinate the then-Crown Prince. If this was really an attempt to reconcile, it was an odd way to go about it. But his performance may best be remembered for his self-description as "the dean of the Arab rulers, the king of kings of Africa and the imam of Muslims". All he needs now is Beyonce and a Roc-a-fella necklace (link here for the lyric reference; probably NSFW).
Second, Omar Bashir. Sudanese President Bashir's appearance and warm reception at the Summit demonstrates the regrettable level of support for the alleged architect of the Darfur horrors and the limited reach of the International Criminal Court. Darfur has increasingly been framed in the Muslim and Arab arenas as a contest between Islam and the West, not as a question of international justice -- yet another legacy of the Bush years, I think, where such a frame fell on fertile soil. The welcome for Bashir will likely overshadow a lot of the more substantive inter-Arab issues under discussion, but the Emir of Qatar -- whose deep involvement in a Sudanese national reconciliation initiative is one of the sources of the current conflict with Egypt -- clearly wanted it.
Third, Hosni Mubarak. For the second year in a row, Hosni Mubarak elected to not attend the Arab summit and to send only low-level representation. Last year, he objected to Bashar al-Asad as host, this year he hoped to send a message of his displeasure with the Emir of Qatar. I suspect that this year it is going to backfire. Most of the Arabs are keen on some form of reconciliation, and there is going frustration with the pace and nature of Egyptian mediation of the Hamas-Fatah national unity government talks. Up until a couple of months ago, all the talk in Arab politics was about how Egypt had lost its regional role and its strategic bearings. It had seemed to recapture its stride with its mediation of the Palestinian talks, and Mubarak had been aggressively working the Arab capitals to try to wreck the Doha summit. But nobody important followed his lead. Don't be surprised if Egypt's reputation suddenly plummets again as a result of its self-imposed diplomatic isolation, and if Qatari calls to challenge the Egyptian monopoly on Palestinian reconciliation gain traction.
Meanwhile, rumors are flying about side-conversations and back-room deals. Here's a preview (in Arabic) of the draft summit resolution. I'll have more as things progress. And I'm trying to get hold of a video of Qaddafi's outburst -- anyone able to help out?
UPDATE: here's a link to the Qaddafi video (thanks, Thomas)
Libya has always been a hoot! Remember last year - the cry for reconciliation and the idea of 'Isratine"?
The rumour is that way back in '03 that King Abdullah totally dissed Libya's Khadaffy by remarking "Dont forget who put you on the throne" (a ref to the gossip that Saudiland had a hand in the Libyan coup that granted Khadaffy the leadership) - and "your grave awaits you" a shocking faux pas that Saudiland's intell knew of Khadaffy's terminal illness.
Source: "Secret History of the Iraq War" by Yossef Bodansky
These are pretty ridiculous comments against Mr. Lynch. He didn't say that Bush framed the Bashir case as one against Islam. I don't like what Mr. Lynch's comments about that issue mean, but that doesn't mean Mr. Lynch deserves vitriol for deigning to give us his insight and share his expertise with us. He's reporting to us what is going on in the middle eastern politics, and in particular at an Arab conference, so of course there is an arab focus here. Mr. Lynch even specifically states that there is a difference between muslim and arab politics, so saying that he is substituting 'arab' for 'middle east' here is obviously completely wrong. I suspect most people commenting here won't even feel the need to state the obvious, but I just feel compelled to point out that what you're saying is so off base as to be absurd.
Keep up the excellent reportage and analysis Mr. Lynch! It is greatly appreciated going back to the days of Abu Aardvark!
So much for His Excellency, the perpetual flip-flopper. In 2002, he was talking of pulling Libya out of the Arab league, now he wants to host its summit. Has he quickly forgotten his words to Edmond Jouve in their 2005 "co-authored book"?
It seems he hasn't lost any of his ability to talk from both sides of his mouth as long as it massages his big ego.
Who knows what next he will do with his African Union chairmanship? maybe propose the merger of both the league and the union, with him as the inevitable choice as King?
I read about that book (titled My Vision) from here:
http://foreignpolicyexchange.blogspot.com/2009/02/gaddafi-africas-anti-obama.html
Marc Lynch is associate professor of political science and international affairs at George Washington University.
Read More
(3)
HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE