Sunday, December 27, 2009 - 5:51 PM

I don't know what kind of contacts the failed airplane bomber did or didn't have with Al-Qaeda Central or Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, and neither does anybody else who has commented since it happened. The extent of such contacts will be mildly interesting, but it surprises nobody working on CT issues that there are still people swimming in the AQ milieu who want to hit the United States, whether on their own or with support from some AQ affiliates. One of the real stories here, which has gone largely unremarked in the coverage I've seen, is that the Arab media generally couldn't care less. Today's news and opinion is dominated by Gaza -- an issue which commands far more popular outrage, anger, and politically mobilized attention than does anything to do with al-Qaeda.
In most of the Arab newspapers which I follow on a daily basis, the failed airplane plot didn't even make the front page -- or, at best, got a small and vague story. Gaza dominates the headlines, as it often does. Yemen continues to command considerable attention because of the ongoing clashes between Saudi Arabia and the Houthi movement, something which has been of far more consistent interest to the Arab public than to the American. Iran's protests are covered heavily. Most of the better papers also focus on local political issues. One of the only papers to cover the story prominently is the deeply anti-AQ Saudi paper al-Sharq al-Awsat, which leads with "passengers save America from a terrorist catastrophe." It's the same on the major pan-Arab TV stations. On the al-Jazeera webpage, the story doesn't even appear on the Arab news page, while a bland story about the airplane incident is only the sixth story on the international page (the same place it held in the broadcast news roundup; yesterday it was the third story in the news roundup, with the killing of 6 Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza the lead). It does not crack the top 6 stories on the al-Arabiya website today.
The Arab media's indifference to the story speaks to a vitally important trend. Al-Qaeda's attempted acts of terrorism simply no longer carry the kind of persuasive political force with mass Arab or Muslim publics which they may have commanded in the immediate aftermath of 9/11. Even as the microscopically small radicalized and mobilized base continues to plot and even to thrive in its isolated pockets, it has largely lost its ability to break out into mainstream public appeal. I doubt this would have been any different even had the plot been successful -- more attention and coverage, to be sure, but not sympathy or translation into political support. It is just too far gone to resonate with Arab or Muslim publics at this point.
The downgrading of al-Qaeda and the "War on Terror" by the Obama administration helps this trend along, even if the dynamics which produced it were largely local and internal to the Arab and Muslim worlds. The failure of the failed plot to capture even a modicum of mainstream Arab public interest speaks volumes to the robustness of this trend... though the frankly disturbing enthusiasm for the story in some quarters in the U.S. suggests that not everybody is happy to see al-Qaeda recede.
UPDATE: according to Kandahar-based Alex Strick van Lin, nobody in Kandahar or the Afghan media care either.
Al-Jazeera screen capture, December 27, 2009
It is true that Gaza dominates, but also they don't care because the suspect is not Arab and they don't see how an attempted terror attack relates to them. BTW, the story does appear on the Al-Jazeera Arabic webpage, as it did yesterday and the day before.
I would say that, the story has acquired its proper dimension in the Arab media.
khairi janbek.paris/france
you said it. the disturbingly numerous elements thirsting for terrorist attacks don't want us taking very heavy casualties, naturally--but just enough to keep reminding the country that tough guys should be in charge instead of pussies like Obama. of course Cheney is their unapologetic leader.
about needing to continually surpass itself in symbolic and destructive power with each new attack. In a weird way, the towers coming down may have been bad for AQ Central. The symbolism of buildings crashing on Wall Street is almost impossible to out do and the increased death toll also sets a higher death bar for new operations. There was the canceled DC subway attack, how many others weren't spectacular enough to carry out in the US?
I agree with Guyver that not being Arab plays a large role in the non-coverage. And the possible Yemen link is pretty sketchy to drive coverage.
On to football for Mark: Congrats on GB success, they are a good team. Brett Favre is not perfect by any means (currently premium content), but he's certainly not a cancer in the locker room. Since I ripped your early season prediction, I'll give my own to evaluate.
The Vikings win easily in Chicago and against the NY football Giants. They will also have no problem in the first playoff game. After that, I have no idea.
Simple, it has no effect on their thrones. Gaza does, so they keep an eye on it.
One of the real stories here, which has gone largely unremarked in the coverage I've seen, is that the Arab media generally couldn't care less.
I don't understand why that's a "real story" in the circles you travel in? I could have predicted that not only could the Arab media care less, but the Arab population could care less too. The only reason Arabs don't support AQ anymore is AQ became an embarrassment. Why would anyone expect a failed attack by AQ to be a big deal in the Arab World, Marc? Seriously? I'm wuite sure YOU didn't, so what are you up to with this post?
Today's news and opinion is dominated by Gaza -- an issue which commands far more popular outrage, anger, and politically mobilized attention than does anything to do with al-Qaeda.
And when was that not true, Marc? Is there any time as long as you've been alive that Palestine has not been the dominant current-events issue in the Arab World?
Again, I'm wondering what you are up to with a post which states so much of the obvious? Is this public diplomacy or something? You trying to convince US policy hacks that they need to forget about terrorism and focus on Gaza, or something? That does seem to be the driving force between most of your posts, and it has been for years, but why not just come out and say so? Why set up all these straw men?
sorry about the bad formatting
I forgot this webiste doesn't support even the most basic of HTML tags :o
So Arab League suffers from al Qaeda Sympathy Fatigue as Americans suffer from Palestinian Sympathy Fatigue
Arab apathy re abortive airliner bombing
I have to agree -- why would the Arab media care about this amateurish attempt to blow up a U.S. airliner? Of course the Arab world is far more concerned about Gaza. Mind you, if AQ strikes successfully in the U.S., the Arab "street," or at least part of it, will applaud the event. Given their helplessness before American/Israeli power, that would be understandable -- though of course the American psyche cannot comprehend this. This is what sixty years of wrongheaded American policy toward the Islamic world leads to, I'm afraid.
The big story of the moment is not this, however, but the issue of Iran. With chaos inside Iran and Obama's Dec. 31 "deadline" fast approaching, the tactical situation has never been better for an Israeli strike against the nuclear facilities. I'm not sure the administration can prevent this (assuming it wants to). The signals of the last few days seem to be pointing towards Israeli military action; I now believe the odds are better than 50-50 that Israel will attack in the next 3-6 months.
I find it amazing how many Americans think military action against Iran would be a good thing. Please explain to me how an Iran possessing 1 or 2 or 200 nuclear bombs threatens the most powerful nation on earth. Deterrence will work with Iran, even with the current regime. Nor is Israel threatened, given its deterrent capability. And even if it were -- shouldn't Americans be concerned about American interests and security? Why is my family, my community, my nation pledged to assist a country whose policies harm U.S. interests and security?
Whether it's AQ or not, nobody in Arab media cares
An interesting observation. However, as others rightly opined, the Arabs are more concerned with the fire in their backyard. The issue of Gaza is horrifying yet the US would not even brook a square criticism of Israel over the suffering. All the talk about a settlement is just that talk.
The failed bombing of the NW flight is not news. Everyone knows Yemen is fighting a civil war not just against the Hoithi Shia! The involvement of US's closed Arab ally - Saudi Arabia - makes the issue more volatile. The Saudis are not fighting terror but a proxy war for the US ostensibly against a Shiah - Iran - which is a fallacy. They are fighting to defend their hereditary authoritarian regime. And the US is fuly backing them; how then can yyou expect the Arab Media to care?
The US would do well to understand he civil sectarian conflict in Yemen berore starting another AFPAK tender box by getting involved in propping up an unpopular regime in the name of war-on-terror!
As for the Yemenis, they really have little control over most of the areas where the AQare supposedly holed up and no amount of air ower can dislodge them. That needs a ground force to hold and pacify the tribes.
Marc Lynch is associate professor of political science and international affairs at George Washington University.
Read More
(11)
HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE