If we keep talking about it, war is likely.

Our failed Iraqi adventure, our protracted and as yet unsuccessful occupation of Afghanistan, and the growing conflict with Pakistan over its shelter and nurture of the terrorists we oppose in Afghanistan are not enough for the militarists among us. They wish to have us enter still another conflict with a country that will make Saddam's Iraq and the Taliban's Afghanistan look like the weak sisters they really were before we chose to invade and occupy them, and touched off insurgencies we still cannot control.

Just as surely as they lied us into Iraq, the neocons would love to convince us that Iran represents a greater threat than it really does. Other than verbal missiles aimed at Israel, what has Iran done to warrant our starting another conflict with international Islam? Is there any concrete proof that Iran is developing nuclear weapons (remember the WMD's in Iraq)? If Iran does develop nuclear weapons, would that justify military action on our part? If so, why not bomb N Korea which clearly does have such weapons? Pakistan? (they have them too, and their status as an 'ally' is highly questionable). What do we say if we bomb them and the result is an even more hostile Muslim world, an Iran unified finally under the guidance of its Mullahs? What if we initiate a war in the middle east which we have neither the resources nor the international support to prosecute? Oops?

A US attack on Iran would be one of the greatest military and strategic blunders in the modern history of the US. The right wing supporters of US interventionism and those who believe in the right of the US to take any military action it deems necessary, is a real threat to US national security. That these people have infiltrated Washington think tanks and the US Congress is cause for concern about our future as a republic. Those who favor aggression against Iran have been working overtime to find (or fabricate) a convincing case for a US attack against the Islamic Republic. Without a concrete and compelling objective for a direct military assault, covert actions, political isolation and sanctions) are the only available US policy alternatives for Iran. That won't satisfy the neocons, and it certainly won't make the US arms industry happy.

A war with Iran would make the strategic blunder of the Iraq invasion and occupation look small by comparison.

As for Israel, if they choose to launch a preemptive military action against Iran, I vote we quote Tonto, who reportedly said, "What you mean 'We', Kemo sabe?"

so they can ratchet up pressure for an Iran war, in George Friedsman's words:

http://www.realclearworld.com/articles/2010/10/26/us_midterm_elections_obama_and_iran_99246.html

"I am arguing the following. First, Obama will be paralyzed on domestic policies by this election. He can craft a re-election campaign blaming the Republicans for gridlock. This has its advantages and disadvantages; the Republicans, charging that he refused to adjust to the electorate's wishes, can blame him for the gridlock. It can go either way. The other option for Obama is to look for triumph in foreign policy where he has a weak hand. The only obvious way to achieve success that would have a positive effect on the U.S. strategic position is to attack Iran. Such an attack would have substantial advantages and very real dangers. It could change the dynamics of the Middle East and it could be a military failure.

I am not claiming that Obama will decide to do this based on politics, although no U.S. president has ever engaged in foreign involvement without political considerations, nor should he. I am saying that, at this moment in history, given the domestic gridlock that appears to be in the offing, a shift to a foreign policy emphasis makes sense, Obama needs to be seen as an effective commander in chief and Iran is the logical target."

Or in Eric Cantors words:

http://www.lobelog.com/jta-gop-congress-means-flurry-of-calls-for-greater-confrontation-with-iran/

[GOP house minority whip Eric] Cantor, in his interview with JTA, emphasized that Obama must make it clear that a military option is on the table.

The republicans and newly elected AIPAC owned GOP winners of this election will make it even harder for Obama to not keep the war talk quiet.

It is very unlikely that there will be any negotiations with Iran in November as, according to the New York Times, the US is completely ignoring Iran's conditions on the talks and is preparing a ridiculous set of its own demands on Iran. Obama and his advisors such as Dennis Ross are unbelievably simple-minded and believe that dealing with a country like Iran is like playing a game. The problem is that Iran is a much better chess player.

The utterly childish demands of Obama on Iran, when it is offering absolutely nothing in return are just unbelievable. Talk of war is not going to go anywhere either since no matter how much they ratchet up the propaganda no one except the brainwashed American public will believe it. With the EU economies in total disaster, no other country other than Israel will join the US. Besides, with the dire state of the US economy and the prospective defeat in Afghanistan, no successful military action can be predicted. With the price of oil potentially going to $200 per barrel and a few US Navy ships being sunk in the Persian Gulf, the end of the US "empire" will happen much sooner than one would expect. So, the likelihood is that nothing will happen. Like the 50-year long sanctions on Cuba and the 60-year long Israeli-Palestinian dispute, Iran will be another piece of evidence for the total emasculation of the US as a world power.

I do believe that If war is consistently being brought up then it could possibly happen. I agree with Lynch on being quiet about war because we're just adding to the drama and attention that Iran wants. The U.S. is making this more of an issue then it needs to be. I understand that the U.S. is taking precautions to this but it's going to be escalated to a war that is really not necessary. The fact that they are already debating about getting the military involved already is ridiculous. I really don't think anything is going to happen. It'll be a waste of time and money.

Exactly what did the war on Iraq prevent? The failure to re-elect the sitting president?

War is inevitable. Israel and the neocons will continue to paint the US into a smaller and smaller corner until it is triggered by some minor event.

If people are worried about Obama doing something stupid, just wait till you elect President Palin!

has left seemingly insoluble oroblems in the Korean peninsula, Iraq and now more seems destined for Afghanistan.

What are they trying to do? Totally destabilise Eurasia so they can maintain an iron grip on their oh-so-precious oil?

K?saca HCG Nedir ?

HCG Damla Amerika’da Dr.Simeons taraf?ndan bulunan bir formülün bitkisel kar???ma gelmi? halidir. HCG Zayiflama Kilo kontrolüne yard?mc? ürün olarak sat?lmaktad?r. Bunun yan?nda vücut direncinizi koruyarak gün içerisinde yemek yemeseniz bile enerjinizde destek sa?layan yan etkisiz bir formül içerir. Klinik olarak bir çok testten ba?ar?l? sonuçlar ile geçen HCG Zay?flama Damlas? Amerika'da ad?ndan s?kça söz ettirmektedir. Bu durumun bir çok nedenlerinden bir tanesi ise di?er ürünler gibi vücudunuzun dengesini bozmadan, metabolizman?z?n h?z?n? kontrol alt?na almadan size etkisini göstermesidir. Bu sayede bo? yere metabolizman?z?n yorulmas?n? engellemi? oluyorsunuz. Bu durum di?er birçok üründen HCG Damlay? farkl? k?lmaktad?r.hcgdamla Damla olmas?n?n etkisi ile birlikte tükürük bezlerinizden vücudunuza kar??arak k?sa zamanda etkisini göstermektedir. Bu sayede vücudunuza ve sindirim organlar?n?za herhangi bir zarar vermemektedir. ??te bu yüzden Amerika'da bu konuda ilk tercih edilen ürünler aras?na girmi?tir.

HCG ilk zamanlar ç?kt???nda i?ne olarak sat??? yap?lmaktayd?. Bu ?ekilde hem günde Birkaç kez vücudunuza i?ne vurmak zorunda kald???n?z gibi tonlarca para harcaman?z gerekmekteydi. De?i?tirilen ve daha da güçlenen formülü ile damla haline dönü?türülen HCG Damla hem kullan?m? hemde etkisi ile çok ba?ar?l? olmay? haketti. Bu nedenlerin birle?mesi ile birlikte dünya üzerinde etkili yöntem olarak yerini almay? ba?ard?.

?nsanlar?n tercih s?ralamas?nda ilk s?ralarda tercih etti?i hCG Damla i?te bu nedenlerden dolay? di?er ürünlerden kendini ayr? tutulmas?na neden olmu?tur.