Saturday, January 15, 2011 - 12:20 PM

An interesting discussion has already broken out over whether Tunisia should be considered a "Twitter Revolution" -- a far more interesting and relevant discussion than whether it was a "WikiLeaks Revolution" (it wasn't). I've seen some great points already by Ethan Zuckerman, Evgeny Morozov, Luke Allnut, Jillian York, and others. I'm looking forward to being one of the social scientists digging into the data, where I suspect that both enthusiasts and skeptics will find support for their arguments. For now, I would just argue that it would be more productive to focus more broadly on the evolution of the Arab media over the last decade, in which new media such as Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, forums and blogs work together with satellite television stations such as Al Jazeera to collectively transform the Arab information environment and shatter the ability of authoritarian regimes to control the flow of information, images, ideas and opinions. That feels like a sentence which I've written a hundred times over the last decade… and one which has never felt truer than the last month in Tunisia.
Calling Tunisia a "Twitter Revolution" is simplistic, but even skeptics have to recognize that the new media environment mattered. I would suggest that analysts not think about the effects of the new media as an either/or proposition ("Twitter vs. Al Jazeera"), but instead think about new media (Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, SMS, etc) and satellite television as collectively transforming an complex and potent evolving media space. Without the new social media, the amazing images of Tunisian protestors might never have escaped the blanket repression of the Ben Ali regime --- but it was the airing of these videos on Al Jazeera, even after its office had been shuttered, which brought those images to the mass Arab public and even to many Tunisians who might otherwise not have realized what was happening around their country. This is similar to how the new media empowered Egyptian "Kefaya" protestors in the early 2000s and Lebanese protestors in 2005, but in a significantly changed media space.
Al Jazeera may be so 2005, but it is still by far the most watched and most influential single media outlet in the Arab world. It has also embraced the new media environment, creatively and rapidly adopting user generated content to overcome official crackdowns on its coverage of various countries -- a practice perfected in Iraq, where it had to rely on locally-generated content after its office was closed down in 2004. Other satellite television stations have followed suit, leading to genuine and highly significant integration among new and slightly-less-new Arab media. All of these media platforms and individual contributors layer together to collectively challenge the ability of states to control the flow of information, images, and opinion. This is the latest stage in the new media revolution in the Arab world about which I've been writing since the early 2000s, and it's profoundly exciting to watch.
I'd point to one other aspect of this which often gets overlooked. Al Jazeera and the new media ecosystem did not only spread information -- they facilitated the framing of the events and a robust public debate about their meaning. Events do not speak for themselves. For them to have political meaning they need to be interpreted, placed into a particular context and imbued with significance. Arabs collectively understood these events quite quickly as part of a broader Arab narrative of reform and popular protest ---the "Al Jazeera narrative" of an Arab public challenging authoritarian Arab regimes and U.S. foreign policy alike. Events in Tunisia had meaning for Jordan, for Lebanon, for Yemen, for Egypt because they were framed and understood within this collective Arab narrative. From Al Jazeera's talk shows to internet forums to the cafes where people talked them out face to face, Tunisia became common focal point for the Arab political debate and identity.
Al Jazeera's role may not fit the current passion for the internet, but overlooking it will lead to some serious misunderstandings of how the media works in today's Arab world and how the Tunisian events might matter outside of that country over the longer term.
Al-Jazeera Screen Capture, January 14, 2011
Excellent point re the role of framing
Marc, I just want to note that this point you made is central to any understanding of what's happening:
"Al-Jazeera and the new media ecosystem did not only spread information -- they facilitated the framing of the events and a robust public debate about their meaning. Events do not speak for themselves... "
Should journalist frame events?
I am not sure that it is the job of journalists to frame events. Social movements of one kind or another may attempt to do that, but surely broadcasters like Al Jazeera should report events, cover different opinions about them and analyze them objectively and impartially, not “imbue them with significance.” These events DO speak for themselves, or at least people around the region are making up their own minds what they mean, not taking the lead from Al Jazeera or any other station.
Spot-on with respect to Arab regional and social media but...
I think it's going to be undeniable that Arab media and social media played some role here, and Marc's post is, as always, clear and to the point.
But I hope that this important debate around the role of media will not turn into the main story in the West generally. That story would be the first peaceful, mobilized overthrow of an apparently well-entrenched Arab authoritarian military leader in the contemporary world, and the repercussions this is likely to have throughout the region.
I like your analysis for how the media helped framing the ongoing events and presenting it to the people - both inside and outside Tunisia - for them to build on it.
However, I do not agree with the argument said by many ones everywhere, that stuff like twitter played the main role in the success of the Tunisian revolution. I don't even understand how the demonstrations in the streets helped in taking Ben Ali down. I've witnessed many demos in the whole region in the past 20 years or more, many were as mass-domes as the Tunisian ones, yet none of them happened to take a dictator down. I know it is still very early to know more details, but from what I've seen, and based on how the Tunisian army reacted, I believe it wasn't only the demonstrations that brought Ben Ali down. I've feeling that there might have been agreements between the oppositions parties and the army there. Also may be some of the members of the regime turned out to be against Ben Ali. I am still not sure of anything yet, yet I am sure a revolution like this requires planning and actions to be done more than just relying on the demonstrations.
Hard to see arab countries making any real progess until they replace presidential "strong man" systems of government with parliamentary systems and executive government accountable to the directly elected legislature. Presidents ceremonial only.
Iraq, of course, is the model.
Al-Jazeera had the most impact on events in Tunisia. Two days before Bin Ali fled, it was giving air time to people calling for his removal. The same day the temporary president took over, he spoke on air with Al-Jazeera asking them to tone down their coverage so they could rebuild. Everyone in the region know this was an Al-Jazeera driven revolution. On call-in programs, people were thanking Al-Jazeera for it's coverage in support of the people of Tunisia.
the brave of people of Tunisia who took to the streets deserve all the credit for the revolution. Al-Jazeera was simply their biggest ally and supporter.
This year, mindful of the events sweeping the Middle East, the regime went to special pains to forestall any protest. In collaboration with the regime, and conceived as a
sazky ruse to deflect protest against their own government, reformists Mousavi and Karoubi called for a rally on February 14 to show “solidarity” with the people of Tunisia and Egypt.
Marc Lynch is associate professor of political science and international affairs at George Washington University.
Read More
(8)
HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE